On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Albert Henderson wrote: > Why not produce hard evidence that Harnad's above claim > is true: > > sh> But virtually all of the self-archived preprints in arxiv are > sh> submitted to refereed journals, revised... [etc] > > and applies to the science literature generally???
Here's some (already cited in reply several times): http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/ http://opcit.eprints.org/ijh198/ For other disciplines than physics, they'll first have to self-archive, then we can do the counting... To repeat a point blithely overlooked in these quibbles: This is about the self-archiving of the REFEREED literature. The preprints are only a bonus (plus a strategic ally in legally circumventing copyright restrictions on self-archiving): http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm#Harnad/Oppenheim Forget about the preprints that never get submitted to or accepted in refereed journals. Those are not what this is all about. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stevan Harnad [email protected] Professor of Cognitive Science [email protected] Department of Electronics and phone: +44 23-80 592-582 Computer Science fax: +44 23-80 592-865 University of Southampton http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/ Highfield, Southampton http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/ SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing free access to the refereed journal literature online is available at the American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00 & 01): http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html You may join the list at the site above. Discussion can be posted to: [email protected]
