On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Hamaker, Chuck wrote: > [OA journals'] "market" is twofold. Researchers deciding where the most > prestige > and attention will be accorded their articles will submit their best. There > shouldn't be many OA journals that are second or third tier... > And we may need to create a "second or third tier" system just to accomodate > material that will no longer meet higher review standards that will be > necessary as authors select venues and pay charges for OA.
These detailed predictions are getting a bit ahead of the game. At the moment, there are fewer than 1000 OA journals and more than 23,000 TA journals, with the high-quality, high-prestige, high-impact journals almost all among the TA journals. Hence it is not at all clear what is the evidence supporting these predictions. Moreover, these predictions assume that most of the OA articles and most of the growth in OA to date have been and are in OA journals, and that is simply not the case. At least 3 times as many articles are made OA annually via the self-archiving of TA articles than via being published in OA journals. The correlation between OA (via either route) and quality is yet to be reckoned. But the correlation -- indeed the causal connection -- between OA and citation impact has begun to be measured, and it is substantial: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0006.gif http://citebase.eprints.org/analysis/correlation.php > If you want your research seen, reacted to, evaluated beyond prepublication > peer review, i.e. actually used and cited by others, the OA journals should > over time win the race because of more potential for readers. Pay journals > only have a potential for more (or fewer) subscribers. No, this is incorrect, both empirically and logically: It is *OA provision* (via either OA journals or OA self-archiving) that has been demonstrated to have the greater usage and citation potential than mere TA (for obvious reasons). Stevan Harnad NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online (1998-2004) is available at the American Scientist Open Access Forum: To join the Forum: http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html Post discussion to: [email protected] Hypermail Archive: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html Unified Dual Open-Access-Provision Policy: BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a suitable open-access journal whenever one exists. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#journals BOAI-1 ("green"): Otherwise, publish your article in a suitable toll-access journal and also self-archive it. http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/ http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
