On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Richard Poynder <[email protected]> wrote: > SH: But Wikipedia's frequent accuracy and usefulness does not (in my view) > counterbalance the fact that it is frequently unreliable and inaccurate too > ... > > RP: Is that not also a reasonable description of the totality of the > research corpus today, and a feature of the peer-reviewed literature that > will become increasingly apparent as more and more of the content published > in the world's 24,000 scholarly journals becomes OA?
It's a reasonable description of both corpora -- if you ignore the difference between (say) 50% unreliability and .05% unreliability...
