Dear all,

I've read this opinion in the Scientist Academic publishing is broken by
 Michael P. Taylor and I think should be of interest of the list

The current system by which academics publish their scientific discoveries is a
massive waste of money.

i would like to point out the three reasons why, according to Michael P Taylor,
researchers continue publishing their papers in Elsevier, even knowing that the
average cost per article in any Elsevier journal in 2010 was $10,500 US.  

First: monopoly effort of some journals (there are no competitors in some areas.
Cell

Second: Academics tend to be conservative

(...) Third, and most important, while it may cost a fraction as much money to
publish in an open-access journal, those savings are not rewarded to the
researchers. With open-access publishing, the researchers must pay those fees
out of their own grant money, or with department funds, while subscription bills
are footed by the university libraries, which have completely separate budgets.
So, even though, under an open-access publishing regime, for every thousand
dollars that a researcher or department spends on author fees, the library could
save eight times as much in paid journal subscriptions, the division of budgets
within universities (and the fact that until all publishing is open access
libraries will still have to continue subscribing to paid journals) is
inhibiting this transition.

I'm sure the list will add some more.

http://the-scientist.com/2012/03/19/opinion-academic-publishing-is-broken/

Cheers

Consol Garcia Gómez
Responsable Unitat de Recerca
Biblioteca del Campus del Baix Llobregat
UPC - BarcelonaTech
CBL Edifici D-7
Esteve Terradas, 10
08860 Castelldefels
Tel. 93 552 35 63
[email protected]
http://bibliotecnica.upc.edu/BCBL/
http://twitter.com/BibliotecaCBL





    [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to