Dear Sridhar,

I agree with you that CC BY ND license is quite restrictive and that CC BY is an
optimal solution. Perhaps in your advice you can refer to:

The Online Guide to Open Access Journals Publishing developed by Co-Action
Publishing and Lund University Libraries Head Office with support from the
National Library of Sweden and Nordbib, which says that "The easiest and most
recommended means of meeting this Open Access standard is to adopt one of the
Creative Commons licenses, in particular the CC-BY (the most liberal license,
allowing all forms of 
re-use)..."(http://www.doaj.org/bpguide/set-up/3/#2-3-3-4-adopt-licensingcopyright-policy)
; 

The SPARC Europe and the Directory of Open Access Journals SPARC Europe Seal for
Open Access Journals: "In order for open access journals to be even more useful
and thus receive more exposure and provide more value to the research community
it is very important that open access journals offer standardized, easily
retrievable information about what kinds of reuse are allowed. Therefore, we are
advising that all journals provide clear and unambiguous statements regarding
the copyright statement of the papers they publish. To qualify for the SPARC
Europe Seal a journal must use the Creative Commons BY (CC BY) license, which is
the most user-friendly license and corresponds to the ethos of the
Budapest Open Access Initiative"
(http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=080423);

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) response to the OSTP’s
request for public comment on Public Access Policies for Science and Technology
Funding Agencies Across the Federal Government - free re-use is as important as
free access: "One of the key motivations of Open Access publishing is to
maximize the potential impact of any piece of published research by removing any
barrier to access or reuse of that work. The best way to achieve that is to
attach a Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) to each and every
publication. Among other things, the use of a CC BY assures that researchers and
institutions are free to post the final published version of that work in any
repository, archive, etc., removing concerns about the circulation of multiple
versions of a particular article. Moreover, from an Open Access publishing
perspective, archives and repositories also provide additional channels for
disseminating authors’ work and encouraging re-use, leading to greater 
impact."
(http://oaspa.org/blog/2010/01/); and

SURF recommendation to use the most liberal Creative Commons license for
articles, which is CC BY (for the detailed
recommendations please read the report Reuse of material in the context of
education and research produced for SURFdirect, the digital rights expertise
community for higher education; authors: Paul Keller - Creative Commons
Netherlands, Wilma Mossink – SURFdirect; editing Annemiek van der Kuil,
SURFdirect: http://www.surf.nl/en/publicaties/Pages/Reuseofmaterial.aspx).

Best wishes,
Iryna

Iryna Kuchma
EIFL Open Access Programme Manager
[email protected]
skype: iryna.kuchma
twitter:@irynakuchma
_____________________________________

EIFL: Knowledge Without Boundaries
Follow EIFL on Facebook, Twitter and RSS.    
View EIFL photos and videos on Flickr and YouTube.
Sign up for the EIFL newsletter.

On 26 April 2012 13:38, Sridhar Gutam <[email protected]> wrote:
      Dear All,

      In the year 2009, when we launched the Open Access Journal of
      Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (OAJMAP) <http://www.oajmap.in> from
      Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Association of India (MAPAI)
      <http://www.mapai.co.nr> we have asked a question on a OA forum on
      what should be the suitable CC license to apply for the OAJMAP.

      We were told and we also got convienced that we should go for CC BY
      ND. But now as we are progressing, I feel unfortable in using 'ND'.

      Why?? the license says -- No Derivative Works — You may not alter,
      transform, or build upon this work.

      But, all the research is derived out from the existing and new
      things would be built on the existing.

      I would like to advice to the Editorial Board, OAJMAP and the
      Management Committee, MAPAI to go for CC-BY.

      Whats your suggestions pleases??

      Sridhar


      __________________________________________________________
      Sridhar Gutam PhD, ARS, Patent Laws (NALSAR), IP & Biotech. (WIPO)
      Senior Scientist (Plant Physiology)
      Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture
      Rehmankhera, Kakori Post
      Lucknow 227107, Uttar Pradesh, India
      Phone: +91-522-2841022/23/24; Fax: +91-522-2841025
      Mobile:+91-9005760036/8005346136
      Publications: http://works.bepress.com/sridhar_gutam/

      _______________________________________________
      GOAL mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal






    [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to