Thanks, Les.  Can you provide us with feedback after the meeting?
Charles

Professor Charles Oppenheim

--- On Thu, 3/5/12, Les A Carr <[email protected]> wrote:

      From: Les A Carr <[email protected]>
      Subject: [GOAL] Re: Willett's Speech in Support of OA
      To: "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)"
      <[email protected]>
      Date: Thursday, 3 May, 2012, 9:32

      Some colleagues have a meeting with him next week. We're briefing
      them. 

      Sent from my iPhone

On 3 May 2012, at 08:57, "CHARLES OPPENHEIM" <[email protected]>
wrote:

      An excellent suggestion from Andrew.  Who would be willing to
      approach Willetts to set up a meeting?
Charles

Professor Charles Oppenheim

--- On Thu, 3/5/12, Andrew A. Adams <[email protected]> wrote:

      From: Andrew A. Adams <[email protected]>
      Subject: [GOAL] Re: Willett's Speech in Support of OA
      To: "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)"
      <[email protected]>
      Date: Thursday, 3 May, 2012, 2:04

      > As trailed earlier, the speech made to the Publishers'
      Association earlier today by David Willetts (the UK
      Minister for Universities and Science) is now
      available.  While we may quibble at some aspects, it is
      hugely supportive of OA:
      >
      >
      
http://www.bis.gov.uk/news/speeches/david-willetts-public-access-to-research

      I'm afraid I do rather more than "quibble at some
      aspects". This shows the
      dangerous misunderstandings about OA that are hindering
      real progress
      (alongside the bizarre inability of most academics to
      see that we need OA as
      a body and that the quickest and easiest way to achieve
      it is to provide it
      mutually). Here are the phrases which worry me:

      "Our starting point is very simple. The Coalition is
      committed to the
      principle of public access to publicly-funded research
      results...
      Perhaps I might speak from the experience of writing my
      own book, The Pinch,
      on fairness between the generations. It was very
      frustrating to track down an
      article and then find it hidden behind a pay wall. That
      meant it was freely
      accessible to a professional in an academic institution,
      but not to me as an
      independent writer."

      He misunderstands that this problem exists for academics
      as well as the
      general public.

      "It would be deeply irresponsible to get rid of one
      business model and not
      put anything in its place."

      I am worried that he is concerned about the profits of
      publishers. Profits
      are not necessarily a natural part of academic
      publishing. If a profitable
      business model exists that reflects added value, then
      that's fine. However,
      finding a model in which costs are covered (and that can
      include subsidy from
      other sources such as membership to scholarly societies,
      direct university
      funding, direct public funding) without those costs
      being diverted into the
      coffers of a rent-seeking parasitic business is needed,
      not a way to ensure
      that someone makes profits while potentially hindering
      academic
      communication. Communication (between academics and from
      them to the rest of
      society) is the goal.

      "The crucial options are, as you know, called green and
      gold. Green means
      publishers are required to make research openly
      accessible within an agreed
      embargo period."

      Here is my biggest problem. Davd Willetts does not
      understand Green OA. Well,
      he's a minister. He generally won't understand all the
      details of every
      speech he makes (the "two brains nickname
      notwithstanding". What is more
      worrying is the fact that this speech reflects the lack
      of understanding
      amongst his speechwriters (political and civil servants
      who act as his
      general staff in deciding policy). With this fundamental
      misunderstanding of
      the fact that Green OA is about academics and
      institutions making their
      papers' contents available gratis while Gold OA is about
      publishers making
      papers' content available, any policy developed by the
      BIUS will be deeply
      flawed.

      I understand that in this speech he was talking to
      publishers. Perhaps we can
      somehow arrange for the Minister for Universities to
      come and give a talk at
      a UK university at which his message might be targetted
      to academics, instead.

      --
      Professor Andrew A Adams                     
      [email protected]
      Professor at Graduate School of Business
      Administration,  and
      Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information
      Ethics
      Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan   
         http://www.a-cubed.info/


      _______________________________________________
      GOAL mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

      _______________________________________________
      GOAL mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal




    [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to