Good morning!
Thinking positively, I would recommend the following change in one clause of
the What rights do I retain as a journal author*? stated in Elsevier's portal,
which says
"the right to post a revised personal version of the text of the final journal
article (to reflect changes made in the peer review process) on your personal or
institutional website or server for scholarly purposes*, incorporating the
complete citation and with a link to the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) of the
article (but not in subject-oriented or centralized repositories or
institutional repositories with mandates for systematic postings unless there is
a specific agreement with the publisher. External link Click here for further
information);"
By this one:
"the right to post a revised personal version of the text of the final journal
article (to reflect changes made in the peer review process) on your personal,Â
institutional website, subject-oriented or centralized repositories or
institutional repositories or server for scholarly purposes, incorporating the
complete citation and with a link to the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) of the
article "
I think this could be something to be encouraged, celebrated and recognized!
Reme
Reme Melero
CientÃfico Titular CSIC
IATA
Avda Agustin Escardino 7, 46980 Paterna, Valencia
Tel 963900022 ext 3121
www.accesoabierto.net
El 11/05/2012 11:19, Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF) escribió:
Hi all,
Â
Iâm glad weâre now moving our conversation on in new directions, and
Iâld like to suggest one which I hope will be productive. The
discussion on this list often seems to me be based on the assumption
that scholarly publishers are a wholly negative force in the open
access world, and a community to be avoided/undermined/mistrusted at
all costs. This feels unwarranted to me â and perhaps other
publishers on this list who are not so audacious as to stick their
heads over the parapet. So, knowing that positive messages are
powerful ways to influence:Â what positive things are established
scholarly publishers doing to facilitate the various visions for
open access and future scholarly communications that should be
encouraged, celebrated, recognized? Â
Â
With kind wishes,
Â
Alicia
Â
Â
Dr Alicia Wise
Director of Universal Access
Elsevier I The Boulevard I Langford Lane I Kidlington I Oxford I OX5
1GB
P: +44 (0)1865 843317 I M: +44 (0) 7823 536 826 I E:
[email protected] I
Twitter: @wisealic
Â
Â
Â
Â
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of CHARLES OPPENHEIM
Sent: 11 May 2012 09:27
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] UK Defamation Bill and OA
Â
This has just been published
-see http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2012-2013/0005/13005.p
df. Â Clause 6 gives special protection against defamation actions to peer
reviewed scholarly articles (the first time peer review has figured in a
piece of legislation??). This is something that scholarly publishers will
no doubt pick up on as an argument against unrefereed green OA.
Â
Charles
Professor Charles Oppenheim
Â
Â
Elsevier Limited. Registered Office: The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, O
xford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom, Registration No. 1982084 (England and Wales).
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
--
Reme Melero
CientÃfico Titular CSIC
IATA
Avda Agustin Escardino 7, 46980 Paterna, Valencia
Tel 963900022 ext 3121
www.accesoabierto.net
[ Part 1.2.2, Image/GIF (Name: "externalLink_3.gif") 85 bytes. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]
[ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
