Remember, please, that PLoS is a not for profit organization and, while this is not an ironclad guarantee of its long-term adherence to its founding principles, it is very different than a for-profit publisher owned by a large multi-national company obligated to maximize return for its investors.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Heather Morrison <[email protected]> wrote: > According to Mark Kleinman, the private equity owners of Springer (EQT, a > private investment company in Sweden and the Government Investment > Corporation of Singapore) are making moves to solicit offers to purchase > Springer. Details: > > http://news.sky.com/story/995576/academic-publishing-giant-springer-for-sale > > Springer is the world's second-largest scholarly publisher (after > Elsevier), and owner of BioMedCentral. > > This might be a good time to start thinking about the implications of > private ownership of scholarly publishing. For example, my understanding > (please correct me if I am wrong) is that Springer was actively involved in > lobbying for gold UK cash for CC-BY from RCUK, and that one of the > rationales for providing this funding is to support UK-based industry. This > puzzles me for many reasons; one is that the major beneficiaries of this > policy are not UK-based at all, and the actual UK-based commercial outfits > (Elsevier, Informa.plc also known as Taylor & Francis, Routledge etc.) are > likely to be hurt by this policy and are likely opposed to it. The largest > OA via CC-BY publishers are BioMedCentral, with an office in London but > ownership in Sweden and Singapore, and PLoS, with a principle US base. > Again, corrections appreciated. > > At any rate, even if Springer currently were UK-owned, what happens when > it is sold? There are no guarantees that the company will be bought by an > organization with a philosophical commitment to open access. Considering > the price, the only likely guarantee is that the next owner will have a > firm commitment to making profits for private owners. > > BioMedCentral and PLoS have done outstanding work as OA publishing > pioneers and developed practices that are good models for others. However, > when planning for the future of OA, it is important to take into account > the environment in which these organizations work. In the commercial > for-profit sector, changes of ownership and/or management, often > accompanied by changes of direction, are much more common than new > companies developing practices that then become the traditions for decades > and centuries that would be needed to ensure ongoing open access. > > best, > > Heather Morrison, MLIS > Doctoral Candidate, Simon Fraser University School of Communication > http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/ > The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics > http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GOAL mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal > -- Michael Eisen, Ph.D. Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Associate Professor, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology University of California, Berkeley
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
