Hello,
I have just posted a blog called "Journal editors take note - you have the 
power" on the Australian Open Access Support Group (AOASG) website - 
http://aoasg.org.au/2013/03/25/journal-editors-take-note-you-have-the-power/

It is a response to the news that the editorial board from the Journal of 
Library Administration <http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjla20/current> has 
resigned in protest of the restrictive licensing policy imposed by its 
publisher Taylor & Francis.

The text is copied below - feel free to circulate.

Comments on the site welcome.

Regards

Dr Danny Kingsley
Executive Officer
Australian Open Access Support Group
Journal editors take note - you have the power
Leave a 
reply<http://aoasg.org.au/2013/03/25/journal-editors-take-note-you-have-the-power/#respond>
Some interesting 
news<https://plus.google.com/109377556796183035206/posts/jCp3NaZGLy2?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20GPeterSuber%20(G%2BFeed%20of%20Peter%20Suber)#109377556796183035206/posts/jCp3NaZGLy2?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20GPeterSuber%20(G%2BFeed%20of%20Peter%20Suber)>
 has come across my desk today, both as an open access advocate and someone who 
is based in a library.
The editorial board from the Journal of Library Administration 
<http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjla20/current> has resigned in protest of the 
restrictive licensing policy imposed by its publisher Taylor & Francis (T&F). 
Brian Mathews includes the text of the resignation in his blog 
here<http://chronicle.com/blognetwork/theubiquitouslibrarian/2013/03/23/so-im-editing-this-journal-issue-and/>.
They might not be aware of it, but the editorial board are following in the 
footsteps of other editorial boards. A webpage put together by the Open Access 
Directory called Journal declarations of 
independence<http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Journal_declarations_of_independence>
  lists examples of "the resignation of editors from a journal in order to 
launch a comparable journal with a friendlier publisher". There are 20 journals 
listed on the pages, with the timeline running from 1989 to 2008.
What is a licensing policy?
For those people new to open access, a quick explainer. This is referring to 
the restrictions the publisher is imposing on what an author can do with copies 
of their published work. T&F say on their 
author<http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/permissions/reusingOwnWork.asp> pages 
that authors who have published work in a T&F journal are limited in what they 
can do with copies of the work:
*         Authors are not allowed to deposit the Publisher's Version
This is fine - the publisher does manage the peer review process and provide 
the electronic distribution platform. They also have investment in the layout 
and design of the page and the manufacture of the downloadable pdf. Most 
publishers do not allow the Published Version to be made available.
*         Authors are allowed to put a copy of the Submitted Version (this is 
the version sent to the journal for peer review) into their institution's 
web-based repository. In some disciplines this is called the pre-print. T&F 
rather confusingly call this the 'Author's Original Manuscript'.

So far so good - it seems quite generous. But in many disciplines, sharing the 
Submitted Version is inappropriate because it may contain errors which could 
reflect badly on the author, or even in some instances be dangerous to be made 
public without correction.
*         Authors are allowed to put a copy of the Accepted Version (the 
author's post-peer reviewed and corrected version) into the institutional 
repository. T&F call this the 'Author's Accepted Manuscript'.

Again this seems generous. But the author can only do this "twelve (12) months 
after the publication of the Version of Scholarly Record in science, 
engineering, behavioral science, and medicine; and eighteen (18) months after 
first publication for arts, social science, and humanities journals, in digital 
or print form".
Bear in mind the peer review and amendment process can take many months and 
there is often a long delay between an article's acceptance and publication. 
This means the work is only able to be made open access two to five (or more) 
years after the original research was done.
This is what the Journal of Library Administration editors were originally 
protesting about, and then they took exception to the suggestion by T&F that 
authors could take up the open access 'option' for a fee USD$2995 per article. 
This amount is far beyond the reach of most H&SS scholars.
The lure of the commercial publisher
Talking to stressed, overworked editors it is easy to see why allowing a 
commercial publisher to take over the responsibility of publishing their 
journal is attractive.
But there is a catch. For a start, in the conversations I have had to date with 
journal editors who have 'sold' their title to a commercial publisher, it seems 
there is no exchange of money for 'goodwill' in the way there would be for the 
sale of any other business.
In addition, when a commercial publisher owns a journal title, it means they 
impose their own copyright transfer agreements - which determine what the 
authors are able to do with their work. This is often more restrictive than 
what the independent editorial team was allowing.
But the most dramatic difference to operations when a previously independent 
journal is bought by a commercial publisher is the amount they charge for 
subscriptions. For example, the Journal of Australian Studies 
<http://inasa.org/?page_id=17>  has a subscription which comes as part of the 
membership to the International Australian Studies Association (InASA). Members 
receive other benefits such as discounts to conferences. It costs AUD105 each 
year.
But if you consult the journal's page 
<http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rjau20> on the T&F website  the 
online subscription is USD781 and the Print & Online subscription is USD893.
It is not that T&F are the only ones, mind you. The Journal of Religious 
History <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9809>  is 
published by Wiley. Members of the Religious History Association can join for 
AUD45, and receive the print and online version of the journal. But 
subscriptions through Wiley range from USD593 for an institutional Print & 
Online subscription, to USD76 for a personal Print & Online subscription.
And when you start looking at Wiley's permissions they are even more 
restrictive than T&F. Again the author can archive the Submitted Version, but 
for the Accepted Version there is an embargo of 0-24 months 'depending on the 
journal' and even then written permission from the publisher is required (good 
luck with that).
So what can journal editors do?
For a start remember that you are crucial to the success of a journal. 
Publishers rely on their editors absolutely to produce journals, which means 
you come into negotiations from a position of strength.
So if you are an editor of an independent journal and are considering 'selling' 
your journal to a commercial publisher the issues worth consideration include:
*         What are the restrictions the publisher will place on the re-use of 
the work published in the journal? Do they align with your current (or intended 
future) position? Are they prepared to negotiate these with you?
*         What will the subscription cost be to the journal? Does that mean 
some readers will not be able to afford subscriptions?

If you are the editor of a journal that is currently being published by a 
commercial publisher:
1.    Check out the restrictions imposed on your authors by looking the journal 
up in Sherpa/Romeo <http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/>
2.    If those restrictions do not meet with the philosophy of the 
dissemination of your journal, consider contacting the publisher to request a 
less restrictive permissions policy

There is evidence that this has worked in the past. On 1 November 2011, T&F 
announced<http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/press/LIS-author-rights-pr.pdf> a two 
year pilot for Library and Information Science Journals, meaning that authors 
published in 35 library and information science journals have the right to 
deposit their Accepted Version into their institutional repository.
It seems that library journals have a reasonable track record on this front. In 
March this year- Emerald Group Publishing Limited 
announced<http://www.emeraldinsight.com/about/news/story.htm?id=4593> a 
'special partnership' with the International Federation of Library Associations 
and Institutions (IFLA). Under this agreement, papers that have their origins 
in an IFLA conference or project and are published in one of Emerald's LIS 
journals can become open access nine months after publication.
Moving your journal to an online open access platform
If you are the editor of an independent journal and you are considering moving 
online, some questions to consider include:
*         Who is your readership and how do they read the journal? In some 
cases the journal is read in lunchrooms in hospitals for example, so the 
printed version is necessary
*         Can the journal go exclusively online and assist readers by providing 
an emailed alert for each issue?

There are many tools to assist journal editors manage the publication process. 
The Open Journal System<http://pkp.sfu.ca/?q=ojs> (OJS) was developed by the 
Public Knowledge Project, and is an open source (free to download) program to 
manage journals.
Australian universities host many open access journals (listed 
here<http://aoasg.org.au/open-access-in-action/australian-oa-journals/>) with a 
considerable portion published using OJS. Most of these journals are run with 
some subsidy from the institution, and do not charge authors article processing 
charges. From the researcher's perspective they are 'free to publish, free to 
read'.
In addition, the National Library of Australia runs the Open Publish 
<http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php> program which hosts many open 
access journals.
If you have questions about this and want to know more please leave a reply to 
this post.


Dr Danny Kingsley
------------------------------------------
Executive Officer
Australian Open Access Support Group (AOASG)
Menzies Library, Building 2
The Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200 Australia

E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
P: +612 6125 6839
W: http://aoasg.org.au
T: @openaccess_oz

Cricos Provider - 00120C

NOTE: I work three days a week: Mondays (on campus), Tuesdays and Thursdays. I 
think about open access 24/7.



_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to