On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, David Wojick <[email protected]>wrote:
Stevan, I am well aware of your vision. I have read your NRC submission. It > just does not happen to be what the US Government is implementing. > It may not be what is being implemented at OSTI, where you are advising, but have you read what each of the other agencies is doing? > The Brits wanted the US to follow them, but that too is not happening. > And a good thing too, since the Finch/RCUK Policy U-Turn was a disaster. But HEFCE<https://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&lr=&q=harnad%20OR%20Harnad%20OR%20archivangelism+blogurl:http://openaccess.eprints.org/&ie=UTF-8&tbm=blg&tbs=qdr:m&num=100&c2coff=1&safe=active#c2coff=1&hl=en&lr=&q=hefce+blogurl:http://openaccess.eprints.org/&safe=active&tbas=0&tbm=blg>and BIS<https://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&lr=&q=harnad%20OR%20Harnad%20OR%20archivangelism+blogurl:http://openaccess.eprints.org/&ie=UTF-8&tbm=blg&tbs=qdr:m&num=100&c2coff=1&safe=active#c2coff=1&hl=en&lr=&q=BIS+Committee+blogurl%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fopenaccess.eprints.org%2F&safe=active&tbm=blg>now look to be fixing that... > The situation is as I describe it. > Perhaps at OSTI. The rest remains to be seen. The OA movement has won some and lost some, across the years, but it's not over till it's over... (1994) A Subversive Proposal<http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015034923758;view=1up;seq=1> (2001) The Self-Archiving Initiative<http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/harnad.html> (2002) The Budapest Open Access Initiative<http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org> (2004) Memorandum to UK To UK Government Science and Technology Select Committee<http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we151.htm> Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence (2007). No Need for Canadian PubMed Central: CIHR Should Mandate IR Deposit<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264173/> . (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research?<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/273080/> (Response to US OSTP RFI). (2011) Comments on Open Access FAQ of German Alliance of Scientific Organisations <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272617/> (Allianz der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen). (2012) Digital Research: How and Why the RCUK Open Access Policy Needs to Be Revised <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/342647/>. Digital Research 2012. (2013). Response to HEFCE REF OA Policy Consultation<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/355015/>. HEFCE. (2013). Comments on HEFCE/REF Open Access Mandate Proposal<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/349893/>. Open access and submissions to the REF post-2014 (2013) Evidence to House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee on Open Access <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/348479/>. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee on Open Access, Winter Issue, 119-123. (2013) Evidence to BIS Select Committee Inquiry on Open Access<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/348483/>. Written Evidence to BIS Select Committee Inquiry on Open Access, Winter Issue (2013). Follow-Up Comments for BIS Select Committee on Open Access<http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/352011/> . *UK Parliament Publications and Records*. (2013) Recommandation au ministre québécois de l'enseignement supérieur<http://www.mesrst.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/administration/librairies/documents/Contributions_courriel_facebook/02-2013_-%3Cu%3EStevan_Harnad%3C/u%3E-_Recommandation_au_ministre_quebecois_de_lenseignement_superieur.pdf> . (2013) Comments on Canada’s NSERC/SSHRC/CIHR Draft Tri-Agency Open Access Policy <http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1063-.html> Multiple Comments on CIHR Open Access Policy <http://j.mp/Harnad-CIHR> Multiple Comments on SSHRC Open Access Policy <http://j.mp/Harnad-SSHRC> Multiple Comments on OA Progress in Canada <http://j.mp/Harnad-Canada-OA> Multiple Comments on NIH Public Access Policy <http://j.mp/Harnad-NIH-OA> Multiple Comments on Harvard Open Access Policy <http://j.mp/Harnad-Harvard> Multiple Comments on France/HAL Open Access Policy<http://j.mp/Harnad-France-HAL> Comments on H. Varmus's 1999 E-biomed Proposal<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/22404/> [1 <http://www.nih.gov/about/director/ebiomed/com0801.htm>] [2<http://www.nih.gov/about/director/ebiomed/com0725.htm> ]
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
