Could we make sure that we do not use "Gold" too quickly as a synonym
for "author-pay Gold". I meet ever more frequently with this confusion
and I think it deeply affects the quality of our analyses and
strategies.

Jean-Claude Guédon

Le dimanche 17 novembre 2013 à 17:38 -0500, Peter Suber a écrit :
> I hope that Dutch researchers will seize the opportunity that
> Wouter Gerritsma describes, and save the Netherlands from repeating
> the mistake of the UK.
> 
> 
> Note, however, that the Netherlands has flirted with gold OA mandates
> at least twice before, and in both cases prior to the Finch report in
> the UK. 
> 
> 
> 
> 1. In a November 2009 interview, Henk Schmidt, Rector of Erasmus
> University Rotterdam, described his plans to require OA, with a
> preference for gold over green. "I intend obliging our researchers to
> circulate their articles publicly, for example no more than six months
> after publication. I'm aiming for 2011, if possible in collaboration
> with publishers via the 'Golden Road' and otherwise without the
> publishers via the 'Green Road'." 
> http://web.archive.org/web/20100213075122/http://www.openaccess.nl/index.php?option=com_vipquotes&view=quote&id=30
> 
> 
> However, in September 2010, he announced the university's new OA
> policy, which is green.
> http://rechtennieuws.nl/30283/als-je-niet-gelezen-wordt-bestaat-je-werk-niet-erasmus-universiteit-zet-in-op-open-access-publiceren.html
> http://roarmap.eprints.org/295/
> 
> 
> 2. In January 2011, J.J. Engelen, Chairman of the NWO (Nederlandse
> Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek), described his preference
> for a future gold OA policy. "These goals of scientic publishing are
> best reached by means of an open access publishing business
> model....Open access publishing should become a requirement for
> publicly funded research. In order to make open access publishing a
> success, the enthusiastic cooperation of the professional publishing
> companies active on the scientific market is highly desirable." 
> http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2011-0622
> 
> 
>      Peter
> 
> 
> Peter Suber
> bit.ly/petersuber 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Gerritsma, Wouter
> <wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl> wrote:
> 
>         @Stevan,
>         
>          
>         
>         Yes Stevan the Dutch secretary of educationhis letter has
>         quite a bit of the Finch tone in it. But there are also some
>         opportunities in his letter for repositories. Dekker actually
>         asks for exact figures on OA in the Netherlands. 
>         
>          
>         
>         "To obtain insight into the situation I request the
>         universities, KNAW and NWO to provide numbers on Open Access
>         publications through the various clearly defined variants of
>         OA."
>         
>          
>         
>         In the Netherlands we have of course Narcis
>         http://www.narcis.nl already, a comprehensive repository of
>         nearly all OA publications in the Netherlands. But counting OA
>         publications only is not sufficient. That is a small mistake
>         in Dekker his letter. What is less well known is that all
>         Dutch universities have to report to ministry of Education all
>         the scientific output as well. This happens through the VSNU
>         
> http://www.vsnu.nl/files/documenten/Feiten_en_Cijfers/Scientific_Research_Agreed_Definitions__def_2011_IRRH-20110624.pdf
>     
>         
>          
>         
>         If due to this letter of Dekker it was decided that all
>         reports on the output of the Dutch Science system to the
>         ministry would be based on the full registration of all output
>         registered in Narcis, on top of all OA publications it already
>         registers, the underlying repositories would be in a much
>         better position. If only Narcis takes up its responsibility
>         and makes reports along the lines I did nearly 2 years ago
>         
> http://wowter.net/2012/02/10/a-census-of-open-access-repositories-in-the-netherlands/
>  the repository infrastructure in the Netherlands would be reinforced as 
> well.    
>         
>          
>         
>         So apart from the fact that OA is on the political agenda in
>         the Netherlands, there is an important momentum for Dutch
>         repositories to seize right now.
>         
>          
>         
>         All the best 
>         
>         Wouter
>         
>          
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         
>         Wouter Gerritsma
>         
>         Team leader research support
>         
>         Information Specialist – Bibliometrician
>         
>         Wageningen UR Library
>         
>         PO box 9100
>         
>         6700 HA Wageningen 
>         
>         The Netherlands
>         
>         ++31 3174 83052
>         
>         wouter.gerrit...@wur.nl
>         
>         wageningenur.nl/library
>         
>         @wowter
>         
>         wowter.net
>         
>          
>         
>          
>         
>         From: goal-boun...@eprints.org
>         [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
>         Sent: zaterdag 16 november 2013 21:50
>         To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
>         Cc: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum; jisc-repositories
>         Subject: [GOAL] The Journal Publisher Lobby in the UK &
>         Netherlands: Part I
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         The UK and the Netherlands -- not coincidentally, the home
>         bases of Big Publishing for refereed research -- have issued
>         coordinated statements in support of what cannot be described
>         other than as a publisher's nocturnal fantasy, in the face of
>         the unstoppable worldwide clamour for Open Access. 
>         
>         Here are the components of the publishers' nocturnal:
>         
>         (1) Do whatever it takes to sustain or increase your current
>         revenue streams.
>         
>         (2) Your current revenue streams come mainly from
>         subscriptions.
>         
>         (3) Claim far and wide that everything has to be done to
>         sustain publishers' subscription revenue, otherwise publishing
>         will be destroyed, and with it so will peer review, and
>         research itself.
>         
>         (4) With (3) as your justification, embargo Green OA
>         self-archiving for as long as possible, and fight against
>         Green OA self-archiving mandates -- or make sure allowable
>         embargoes are as long as possible.
>         
>         (5) Profess a fervent commitment to a transition to full 100%
>         immediate OA -- but Gold OA, on your terms, in such a way as
>         to ensure that you sustain or increase your current revenue
>         streams.
>         
>         (6) Offer hybrid Gold OA and promise not to "double-dip." That
>         will ensure that your subscription revenues segue seamlessly
>         into Gold OA revenues while maintaining their current levels.
>         
>         (7) To hasten the transition, offer even Bigger Big Deals to
>         cover subscriptions at the national level (as you had always
>         dreamt of doing) until all payment is safely converted (Gold)
>         OA.
>         
>         (8) Encourage centralized, collective payment of Gold OA fees
>         too, in even Bigger Deals, so Gold OA can continue to be
>         treated as annual institutional -- preferably national --
>         payments rather than as piecewise payments per individual
>         article.
>         
>         (9) Persuade governments to mandate, subsidize and prefer Gold
>         OA rather than mandating Green OA 
>         
>         (10) Make sure Green OA is perceived as delayed OA (because of
>         your embargoes!), so that only Gold OA can be immediate.
>         
>         (11) Mobilize the minority OA advocates who are in a great
>         hurry for re-use rights (CC-BY, text-mining, republication) to
>         support you in your promotion of Gold OA and demotion and
>         embargoing of Green OA.
>         
>         (12) Cross your fingers and hope that the research community
>         will be gullible enough to buy it all.
>         
>         There is, however, a compeletely effective prophylactic
>         against this publisher fantasy (but it has to be adopted by
>         the research community, because British and Dutch Ministers
>         are apparently too vulnerable to the publishing lobby):
>         
>         
>                 (a) Research funders and institutions worldwide adopt
>                 an immediate-deposit mandate, requiring, as a
>                 condition of funding, employment and evaluation, that
>                 all researchers deposit their final, peer-reviewed
>                 drafts in their institutional repositories immediately
>                 upon acceptance for publication, regardless of whether
>                 they are published in a subscription journal or a Gold
>                 OA journal -- and regardless of whether access to the
>                 deposit is made Green OA immediately or only after a
>                 publisher embargo.
>                 
>                 (b) Do not mandate or designate any extra money to pay
>                 for Gold OA: let that come from the subscription
>                 cancellation savings -- if and when Green OA actually
>                 releases institutions to cancel subscriptions.
>                 
>                 (c) To tide over research access needs during any
>                 embargo, make sure to implement the institutional
>                 repository's automated copy-request Button so that any
>                 user can request -- and any author can provide -- a
>                 single copy for research purposes with just one click
>                 each.
>                 
>                 
>                                            
>                 ______________________________________________________
>         
>         
>         Now please read how fully the Dutch government fell for the
>         publishing lobby's nocturnal fantasy. (Tomorrow you will see
>         the same from the UK.)
>         
>         Here is a quick google translation of excerpts from Sander
>         Dekker, Secretary of Education, Culture and Science,
>         Netherlands on "Commitment to further developments in open
>         access scientific publication"
>         
>         Sander Dekker, Secretary of Education, Culture and Science,
>         Netherlands:
>         
>         "A clear choice in favour of Open Access publications; the
>         transition process provides the necessary speed and shortens
>         the transition period, thus avoiding unnecessary additional
>         costs... .
>         
>         "The Green road is the form in which the author publishes an
>         article in a journal. In addition, the author deposits a
>         version of the article in Open Access electronic archive
>         ( repository ). There are both discipline-based and
>         university-based repositories. The system of paid
>         subscriptions to journals continues. Publishers often
>         negotiate embargo periods that can range from several months
>         to several years before an article can be made OA through a
>         repository. During the embargo period, only the paid version
>         of the journal accessible. This constitutes a source of
>         revenue for publishers. Moreover, there are publisher
>         restrictions on the version of an article in the repository.
>         Sometimes this may only be the version that has not yet been
>         peer reviewd...
>         
>         "Netherlands is in a special position because it has a number
>         of major scientific publishers within its borders. That makes
>         dialogue between science and the Dutch publishing possible...
>         
>         "In the UK, a national committee chaired by Dame Janet Finch
>         laid the foundation for the Open Access policy of the United
>         Kingdom. The report of the Commission Finch serves as a solid
>         standard . It contains a thorough analysis of developments and
>         progress. The Committee notes that due to the major changes it
>         is imperative that all players act together and she advises to
>         achieve by focusing on Open Access journals. Transition
>         Following this advice, the British government earmarked 10
>         million pounds for Open Access. The initial signs indicate
>         that this has not led to an accelerated transition , but
>         rather a continuation of the transition...
>         
>         "The transition to the Golden Road: My preference is for Open
>         Access publishing in journals that make their articles
>         accessible free, the Golden road. My aim is to achieve OA
>         within ten years: a full transition to Open Access Golden Road
>         by 2024. to achieve this, at least 60 percent of the
>         scientific publications Open Access should be available in
>         about five years through the Gold OA journals...
>         
>         "The real change can only be achieved if we work together at
>         the international level with National cooperation and
>         coordination equally important...
>         
>         "Open Access in the coming years: Dutch universities, KNAW and
>         NWO should give priority to Open Access Golden road...
>         
>         "While the publishers have not yet made the transition to Open
>         Access Golden road I prefer hybrid Open Access, where the
>         institution pays for publication in a traditional journal...
>         
>         "For disciplines where the potential for Gold Open Access
>         journals is still limited, it is possible to provide OA via
>         the Green road...
>         
>         "1. Consultation with likeminded countries: I will get in
>         touch with a number of like-minded countries to promote and
>         acceleration Open Access. I refer primarily to the United
>         Kingdom and Germany . This is because there are a large number
>         of important commercial and academic publishers in the
>         Netherlands and in these two countries i. In addition,
>         Denmark, Finland, Belgium and France are leading like-minded
>         countries...
>         
>         "2. Create conditions under which open access possible: An
>         important momentum in the transition to Open Access
>         publications when the scientific organizations and major
>         scientific publishers agree on subscriptions to scientific
>         journals . This 'big deals' always apply for some years…."
>         
>         "3. reports: If the parties concerned are not sufficiently
>         committed , or developments in insufficient progress , the
>         minister and I imagine that the obligation to publish Gold OA
>         to be included in the Law on Higher Education in 2016 Open
>         Access and Research Act (WHW )…."
>         
>         Sander Dekker, Secretary of Education, Culture and Science,
>         Netherlands
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         GOAL mailing list
>         GOAL@eprints.org
>         http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GOAL mailing list
> GOAL@eprints.org
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal


-- 

Jean-Claude Guédon
Professeur titulaire
Littérature comparée
Université de Montréal

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to