You could check out
http://openaccesspublishing.org/oa11/article.pdf
as well as
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157713000710
green version
http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto/preprints/Journalacceptancerates.pdf
Bo-Christer
On 12/21/13 5:43 PM, Gerritsma, Wouter wrote:
Dear all,
With regards to this really excellent initiative I am looking in to
the various degrees in transparency of the peer review process. Has
anybody examples at hand of editorials, where they give an overview of
number of articles submitted, and ultimately accepted, and the time
the whole cycle from submission to final publication actually took. So
now and then I have seen this in journals, but can't find any example
right now.
I would be grateful for some hints.
Wouter
Wouter Gerritsma
Team leader research support
Information Specialist -- Bibliometrician
Wageningen UR Library
PO box 9100
6700 HA Wageningen
The Netherlands
++31 3174 83052
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]%0d>__
wageningenur.nl/library <http://wageningenur.nl/library>
@wowter <http://twitter.com/Wowter/>
wowter.net <http://wowter.net/>
#AWCPhttp://tinyurl.com/mk65m36
*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
Behalf Of *Claire Redhead
*Sent:* donderdag 19 december 2013 16:41
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [GOAL] Joint Statement on Principles of Transparency and
Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
The Committee on Publication Ethics
<http://publicationethics.org/%E2%80%8E>, the Directory of Open Access
Journals <http://www.doaj.org/>, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers
Association <http://oaspa.org/>, and the World Association of Medical
Editors <http://www.wame.org/>are scholarly organizations that have
seen an increase in the number of membership applications from both
legitimate and non-legitimate publishers and journals. Our
organizations have collaborated in an effort to identify principles of
transparency and best practice that set apart legitimate journals and
publishers from non-legitimate ones and to clarify that these
principles form part of the criteria on which membership applications
will be evaluated.
This is a work in progress and we welcome feedback on the general
principles and the specific criteria. Please see the full statement
<http://oaspa.org/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing/>
on the OASPA blog (http://oaspa.org/blog/).
Claire Redhead
Membership & Communications Manager
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, OASPA
http://oaspa.org/
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
