On 20 December 2013 13:41, Jan Velterop <[email protected]> wrote: > So why don't subscription publishers use that distinction in their > policies and provide a simple, human-readable-only version freely, on their > own web sites (findability, transparency as regards usage), while keeping > the fully functional, machine-readable version for the professional > scientist (power-user) covered by subscription pay-walls? >
Because if the provisional version was sufficiently human readable, then all of the subscriptions for providing basic access would be unnecessary, and cancelled. Licencing the enhanced, machine-readable version would only occur when someone justifies that they have a project to text-mine the corpus. At which point, and despite having theoretically "freed up" the budget, the cost would mean that most text-mining efforts never even get off the ground. And so free [to author] publishing as subscription publishers currently do would be unsustainable. G
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
