In fairness to Jonathan Bate ... his concern about a future loss of "nurturing, 
marketing, and production values', currently provided by book publishers, is 
not unreasonable.

Dana L. Roth
Caltech Library  1-32
1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125
626-395-6423  fax 626-792-7540
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://library.caltech.edu/collections/chemistry.htm

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Stevan Harnad
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:05 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Times Literary Supplement on Open Access

A very silly piece in 
TLS<http://www.the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article1360491.ece> by Shakespeare 
scholar Jonathan Bate in which -- despite noting that until at least 2020 HEFCE 
has not mandated OA for books, only for journal articles -- he decries shrilly 
the doom and gloom that the HEFCE mandate portends for book-based humanity 
scholarship. The gratuitous cavilling is, as usual, cloaked in shrill alarums 
about academic freedom infringement...
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to