This from a recent item in Nature ...

"RCUK says that the licence problem is compounded by researchers not 
understanding which licence they need to use to comply with the open-access 
policy, and by publishers offering a range of ‘open’ licences. (Since January, 
all 18 open-access journals owned by Nature Publishing Group have switched to 
using the fully liberal CC-BY 4.0 licence as a default, and to charging a flat 
fee.)"

---

"The RCUK review did not have the remit to question whether RCUK should 
continue to hand out money for gold open-access publishing. But with a new UK 
government in the offing and the country looking increasingly isolated in its 
gold-leaning stance, there must be a concern that the agency might end up 
scrapping its gold preference. Last year, four influential UK 
university-funding bodies announced a green open-access policy that will 
further steer academics towards delayed public archiving of manuscripts."

More at: 
http://www.nature.com/news/all-that-glitters-1.17266?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20150409

Dana L. Roth
Millikan Library / Caltech 1-32
1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125
626-395-6423 fax 626-792-7540
[email protected]
http://library.caltech.edu/collections/chemistry.htm
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to