<apologies for cross posting>
Hello all,
You may be interested in the latest Unlocking Research blog: 'Half-life
is half the story' https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=331
<snip>
This week theSTM Frankfurt Conference
<http://www.stm-assoc.org/events/frankfurt-conference-2015/>was told
that a shift away from gold Open Access towards green would mean some
publishers would not be 'viable' according to a story in/The Bookseller/
<http://www.thebookseller.com/news/green-oa-will-hit-publishers-314667>.
The argument was that support for green OA in the US and China would
mean some publishers will collapse and the community will 'regret it'.
It is not surprising that the publishing industry is worried about a
move away from gold OA policies. They have proved extraordinarily
lucrative in the UK withWiley and Elsevier each pocketing an extra £2
million
<https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/publishers-share-10m-in-apc-payments/2019685.article>thanks
to the RCUK block grant funds to support theRCUK policy on Open Access
<http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/>.
But let's get something straight. There is*no evidence that permitting
researchers to make a copy of their work available in a repository
results in journal subscriptions being cancelled*. None.
</snip>
--
Dr Danny Kingsley
Head of Scholarly Communications
Cambridge University Library
West Road, Cambridge CB39DR
P: +44 (0) 1223 747 437
M: +44 (0) 7711 500 564
E: [email protected]
T: @dannykay68
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3636-5939
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
