Hi all,

My first time posting a question to the GOAL list. I wondered if anyone in 
France or familiar with the Digital Republic bill (Republique Numerique) could 
tell me a bit more about its implications for OA to French publicly funded 
research (eg. CNRS).

I've read a bit about the bill in English and have run some things through 
Google Translate, now regretting my poor attention in French class in secondary 
school. The news articles I've 
read<http://www.networkworld.com/article/2995978/opensource-subnet/france-votes-to-expand-open-source-use.html>
 make it sounds like a laudable process, open to public consultation on the 
Internet, with some popular propositions to reduce proprietary software in 
schools and universities in favour of Linux/GNU, as well as proposals to 
protect privacy of personal data and encryption.

Article 9 concerns Open 
Access<https://www.republique-numerique.fr/consultations/projet-de-loi-numerique/consultation/consultation/opinions/section-2-travaux-de-recherche-et-de-statistique/article-9-acces-aux-travaux-de-la-recherche-financee-par-des-fonds-publics/versions/une-duree-d-embargo-plus-courte-ne-pas-entraver-le-tdm-fouille-de-texte-et-de-donnees-et-ne-pas-interdire-une-exploitation-commerciale>
 to public research.

I've read contradictory statements about what the bill proposes in terms of 
embargoes for Green archiving. This SciELO blog post (October 
9)<http://blog.scielo.org/en/2015/10/09/france-prepares-bill-to-regulate-open-access/>
 suggests that the bill proposes that publicly funded research should be made 
publicly accessbile without embargo; whereas the statements and annotations of 
the article on the Republique Numerique 
website<https://www.republique-numerique.fr/consultations/projet-de-loi-numerique/consultation/consultation/opinions/section-2-travaux-de-recherche-et-de-statistique/article-9-acces-aux-travaux-de-la-recherche-financee-par-des-fonds-publics/versions/une-duree-d-embargo-plus-courte-ne-pas-entraver-le-tdm-fouille-de-texte-et-de-donnees-et-ne-pas-interdire-une-exploitation-commerciale>
 suggest that there was an original proposal of an embargo of 12 months for STM 
and 24 months for HSS, which has now been modified to 6 and 12 months 
respectively. I've read one or two comments on Twitter this morning suggesting 
that the embargo periods are still very much under discussion.

The SciELO blog also suggests that there are provisions to encourage text and 
data mining and to end the exclusive transfer of copyright of publicly funded 
research and data to publishers. I haven't found much detail on these or any 
support for Gold.

I'd be interested to know what the view is on the OA article amongst the OA 
community in France and also what people have made of the process to establish 
digital rights. I remember that Brazil went through a similar process with a 
Digital Rights bill last 
year<https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2014/06/brazil-new-global-internet-referee/>,
 of course following on from the Snowdon revelations which had a big impact in 
Brazil, much of which was weakened by the time it got into law.

Many thanks for any information you can provide me...

Andrew Hyde
Development Editor (Open Access)
+44 (0)1223 326031 | @andrewchyde<https://twitter.com/andrewchyde>

Cambridge University Press
University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS







Cambridge University Press is the publishing business of the University of 
Cambridge with VAT registered number GB 823 8476 09.  Our principal office is 
at University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United 
Kingdom.
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to