Dear list subscribers,

Just to alert you to a new post on the OpenAIRE blog that might be of interest 
to you, entitled “After SSRN: Hallmarks of trust for subject repositories”.

In the aftermath of the recent sale of the social sciences pre-print and 
publishing community platform SSRN to Elsevier, I offer a personal view on the 
nature of trust in community platforms and the need to make clear the hallmarks 
of trust for subject repositories, namely open governance, open source, open 
data.

Excerpt:

The issue here is not that the company has been sold, nor that it has been sold 
to Elsevier specifically (though the fact that the buyer is the bête noire of 
the open access narrative surely doesn’t help). There is of course a place for 
private companies in the scholarly communications ecosystem. Running a 
for-profit is undoubtedly very hard and for many small companies, acquisition 
is their long term exit strategy. The issue here is not public versus private 
but rather a wider one of trust. Services like Mendeley or SSRN are ”social” in 
nature – built to a large extent upon the contributions of their communities of 
users.  If communities of users bring much of the value that fuels services 
like SSRN, why should they be content to take at face value promises which 
might quickly disintegrate once they come into conflict with money-making? 
Surely these communities deserve a stake in deciding what happens to those 
services. Had users known that SSRN would eventually sell to Elsevier, many 
would not have joined in the first place. Now that they have, many would like 
to take their community elsewhere – with former users like  Paul 
Gowder<https://medium.com/@PaulGowder/ssrn-has-been-captured-by-the-enemy-of-open-knowledge-b3e5bca6751d#.2hzdw8azh>
 already discussing starting a new open repository for the social sciences, for 
example. These issues lead naturally to the questions: what does an “open 
repository” look like? How are users to identify one, and upon which criteria 
should librarians and others responsible for recommending such services decide 
whether a service is to be recommended?
See: https://blogs.openaire.eu/?p=933

Apologies if not relevant to you!

Best to all

Tony


Dr. Tony Ross-Hellauer

OpenAIRE<https://www.openaire.eu/> Scientific Manager
University of Göttingen
Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: +49 551 39-31818
Twitter: @tonyR_H<https://twitter.com/tonyR_H>

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to