Danny is spot on. The real conversation is about the reward system. In
particular, we need to move away from two principles:
1. Journals are not good tools to evaluate the quality of individual
works; individual works are;
2. Present reward systems focus exclusively on the outcome of
competition; science need cooperation and sharing at least as much as
competition.
Jean-Claude
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2018 à 12:35 +0000, Danny Kingsley a écrit :
> <Apologies for cross posting>
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> To add to the collection of commentary on Plan S I have just
> published two sister blogs on Unlocking Research:
> 
> "Relax everyone, Plan S is just the beginning of the discussion"
> https://unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=2148  and"Most Plan S
> principles are not contentious"
> https://unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=2145
> 
>  
> The general points are that this is a statement of principle rather
> than a set of policies, it does not necessarily represent a ligature
> on academic’s choice of publication (note that hybrid is not
> necessarily
>  off the table and green OA is compliant with zero embargo and a CC-
> BY license), and that the real conversation we should be having is
> about the academic reward system rather than Plan S itself.
>  
> Enjoy!
>  
> Danny
>  
>  
> Dr Danny Kingsley
> Deputy Director - Scholarly Communication & Research Services
> Head, Office of Scholarly Communication
> Cambridge University Library
> West Road, CB3 9DR
> e: [email protected]
> p: 01223 747 437
> m: 07711 500 564
> t: @dannykay68
> w: www.osc.cam.ac.uk
> b: https://unlockingresearch.blog.lib.cam.ac.uk  
> o: orcid.org/0000-0002-3636-5939
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________GOAL mailing
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to