--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "J. Almeida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Please be objective. Unlike the Medical Board which >assessed the prognosis on the basis of the full >medical records and other relevant evidence, I write >only the little that I know. > >Let's assume that the best known conventional >treatment was given. I have no reason or intent to >believe or suggest otherwise. The question still >remains: what was Matteo Colella's prognosis? > >................................................................ > >I am as yet unable to find any grounds for differing with their >verdict. >
Dear Joel: I will make this my last post on this thread. I think I have made my point of view abundantly clear. I hope you realize that you are not exactly objective about this matter. You are drawing your conclusions based on "the little that you know". As long as people (even those with a scientific background like you) are willing to throw caution to the wind, and believe in the miracles of their particular faith based on "the little that they know", those of us who see no reason to invoke supernatural explanations to account for natural phenomena will remain SKEPTICAL. Regards, Santosh =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-W-E-B---S-I-T-E-=-=-= To Subscribe/Unsubscribe from GoaNet | http://www.goacom.com/goanet =================================================================== For (un)subscribing or for help, Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dont want so many e=mails? Join GoaNet-Digest instead ! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Help support non-commercial projects in Goa by advertizing!! * * * * Your ad here !!
