Floriano I am digressing but your management lesson is incomplete. You are describing investors, consumers, potential consumers, and perhaps labor and management. But the vendor and suppliers have a role too. In this case IGO & Rajan have to make their case too. If we are to consume their ideas and participate we need to know, are they:
HONORABLE/TRUSTWORTHY OR NOT ABLE TO DELIVER QUALITY CONSISTENTLY OR PERIODICALLY OR NEVER EFFICIENT WITH MONEY OR SCAM ARTISTS PEOPLE WITH A GOOD TRACK RECORD OR QUESTIONABLE PAST STRICT WITH TRUTH OR PARTIAL George --- Floriano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear netters, > > This concerns the Sunday Reflections on the IGO by Valmiki Faleiro and the > below reproduced response thereof from George Pinto, Jose Coloco, Samir > Kelekar and Ben Antao. > What I make out of all this is that there are LEVELs to be attributed to > this IGO affair, as in any management studies. > These levels would be: > 1. DETRACTORS > 2. OBSERVERS > 3. PARTICIPANTS > 4. FACILITATORS & > 5. LEADERS. > > It would be a simple exercise to tick-mark one's own level in this > exercise. And I must say that, relevant to the below reproduced posts, the > exercise could be invigorating if more people would tick themselves off at > No.3. > > Best regards > floriano __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ########################################################################## # Send submissions for Goanet to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # PLEASE remember to stay on-topic (related to Goa), and avoid top-posts # # More details on Goanet at http://joingoanet.shorturl.com/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
