In a message dated 12/3/2003 7:50:22 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I do not intend to challenge the knowledge and scholarship of >Santosh but can't help mentioning that he sounds profoundly naive. >
Please feel free to challenge both. I agree with you that I am profoundly naive. But it would be a great help if you demonstrate my naivete by giving us evidence in support of a "most researched and reliable" ayurvedic treatment against a specific disease. > >What he apparently means by "scientific validation" and "critical >analysis" are US FDA certification. > No. That is not what I mean. Please read my last two posts to find out what I mean. > >None of the points raised by Filomena makes any sense to him because >he apparently shares the tunnel vision of his bosses in the US, for >whom accomplishments from outside the Western world are just voodoo, >or at best pseudo-science. > I work in an institution and a field of activity in which we practice freedom of thought. I have no bosses. My thoughts are my own. I am not interested in petty politics of East versus the West. > > does it occur to Santosh that there are many things in this whole >wide world -- in the realm of science, health and medicine -- to >which the Western "critical analysts" have no clue at all? > I would love to find out what these things are, and if they have passed muster with all the Eastern critical analysts, of whom there are many, and thankfully for genuine Science. Cheers, Santosh ########################################################################## # Send submissions for Goanet to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # PLEASE remember to stay on-topic (related to Goa), and avoid top-posts # # More details on Goanet at http://joingoanet.shorturl.com/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
