# If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others #
##########################################################################
Phillip,
I have excluded harrier crashes from the dabolim debate because nearly all of them have been at sea, from the deck of aircraft carriers. In my previous posts, some time ago, and which you obviously have not read, I have given the statistics of crashes at dabolim, affecting civilian lives, over the past 30 years. Most of the stuff you have been churning out on this forum has been discussed in the past. Have a good day.
regards, Gilbert Menezes.
Message: 7 From: "Philip Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:04:49 +0530 Subject: [Goanet]Dabolim Airport Debate Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESPONSE TO GILBERT MENEZES' ON SEA HARRIERS OF OCT 24
I disagree that the crashes of naval aircraft are not part of the Dabolim airport debate. They are tied to the integral issue of airport safety specially since so much incendiary stuff is stored all around and the place is heavily populated. The discomfort probably arises because it is as applicable to commercial flight operations as it is to naval flight operations.
_________________________________________________________________
The all-new MSN Mesenger! Get the coolest emoticons. http://server1.msn.co.in/sp04/messengerchat/ Share more of yourself!
