# If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others #
##########################################################################
--- Chris Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about the George Bush who liberated 50 million Afghanis and Iraqis from
> tyrants, and gave Afghanistan the first democratically held (under UN
> supervision) election in their history? Reason enough?
>
That sounds like a reason for Bush to be elected as the President of Iraq and
Afghanistan, not the USA.
-Tariq
People talk about 'democratic' elections in Afghanistan. I don't think Hamid Karzai
would have survived to see the elections, if he was not protected by American
troops and bodyguards! This fact alone does not reflect well for a "Democratic
Afghanistan". The elections and a "free" Afghanistan is only for the Republican
voters of the US!
In Iraq, over 1100 American troops have died and over 100,00 Iraqis, since
it was 'liberated'! No WMDs were found and the sole purpose of the war,
was to get rid of those! Then the focus shifted to getting rid of a tyrant,
then to introduction of 'democracy'! How can one call it democracy, when
the US, with a so called ragtag 'alliance' of the UK and some poor East
Europian countries, impose its people and constitution on the hapless Iraqis?
I think that the Bush Administration policies have made the world more unsafe a place.
Nagesh
