########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
--- Peter D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I should have clarified--I meant that Senator >Kerry did nothing significant in the Senate, meaning >nothing that merited a mention in the endorsements that >came from his staunchest supporters. > Peter, I am sorry. But you continue to misrepresent Kerry's senate record. To most unbiased people Kerry's accomplishments in the senate, which I enumerated earlier, are highly significant. Indeed, most non-partisans consider Kerry's achievements over the past 20 years, or for that matter, over the past 40 years, orders of magnitude more exemplary than Bush's achievements over that time frame. Cheers, Santosh
