########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
--- Sachin Phadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Seems to me that he is saying that anything that is >radically tilted to the right is by definition wrong. >Does not mount to much of an argument, since one can >say that anything one is opposed to is radically >tilted. And what about radically tilted to the left? >And who is to decide? > Sachin, You misunderstand by position. What I said applies only to Bush. I don't expect him to radically tilt towards the left. As a general rule, I oppose radical policies based on ideology, irrespective whether they are tilted to the left or the right. I oppose the postmodernist wackos on the left as much as I oppose the religious bigots on the right. I have consistently supported every idea that is borne out of scientific fact and physical evidence, regardless of whether it is perceived to be on the right or the left of the political spectrum. I challenge you to point to anything that I have written over the past 8 years on Goanet that is at variance with this assertion. However, on issues that cannot be resolved by facts alone, as they stand today, I am an agnostic, and quite comfortably to the left of center. Cheers, Santosh
