########################################################################## # If Goanet stops reaching you, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] # # Want to check the archives? http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/ # # Please keep your discussion/tone polite, to reflect respect to others # ##########################################################################
--- Gabriel de Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I also know that I am guilty of hijacking the > discussion, taking it off to a different track. I sort > of regret doing this, I give you tremendous credit for saying this. You are one of the few who is sensible on these matters. > the hyprocrisy that is being spouted. As far as you > and many others are concerned, it appears OK for India > to occupy Goa, but not so for Israel to occupy > Palestine? I disagree it is hypocrisy except to few. There are a lot more people who refer to Dec 1961 as liberation than invasion and do not believe India occupies Goa. I have not got into these discussions for two reasons: 1. The Cybergoan archives are full of these discussions. 2. Most of the people who think Dec 1961 was an invasion aren't really offering any plan or action today, excepting sending emails. You will agree with me that after awhile it becomes tiring reading the same emails and in every hijacked discussion. In the case of Israel and Palestine, almost everyone agrees it is occupation, including Sharon - that why he is talking about pulling out of parts of Gaza. Regards, George
