Tim,
I think every country discriminates against non-nationals in some way or the other. (Trying being Indian, brown and getting a holiday visa to the US!) So what are we really complaining about?
In the case of India, this comes in the shape of an economic surcharge. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this happens in only a very limited number of hotels, while the rail and air foreigner-rates don't add up for much.
On the other hand, isn't it a scam that international tourism today -- specially when involving the so-called 'developing countries' -- is premised on the fact that people from the affluent world can get an almost-free holiday in a world where a lot of people still starve or suffer from a lack of food and resources? (Don't turn around to say there are people who gain from tourism, and hence keep inviting the guests over.) FN
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Tim de Mello wrote:
The two tier system that was being discussed was the official system where non-resident Indians are charged more than local - not "cheating" by some.
I was horrified when my wife and I visited the Taj Mahal two years back. Local residents had to pay Rs. 20/- and foreigners had to pay Rs. 750/-. This was an official charge posted on the wall - not just an official trying to fleece us.
I notice now that this has been changed since.
I can understand a small surcharge as is being done now to pay for upkeep, etc. - but I would have preferred if it was a voluntary contribution.
Other places where this two-tier system is practiced: Hotels Rail fares Air Fares etc.
Tim de Mello [EMAIL PROTECTED] CANADA
