--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The "mainstream" environmentalists don't just
disagree >with Dr. Michaels, they want to crush him
>professionally as their comments show.
> 

Mainstream environmental scientists have refuted Pat
Michaels' conclusions and opinions with sound
scientific arguments. Those who are interested in
finding out the details about these scholarly
critiques, please feel free to email me. 

It is now abundantly clear that the above poster
cannot defend his erroneous statements about global
warming, Mount St. Helens, man-made emissions of
greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide levels, carbon
monoxide persistence in the atmosphere, etc.

But I am certain that eventually I will have to
declare him the winner of this debate, as well.

Cheers,

Santosh

Reply via email to