--- Mario Goveia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The hysterical calumnies of Santosh Helekar continue >unabated. This guy is either delusional or paranoid.
> Quite predictably, Mario Goveia continues his shameless tirade against me because I pointed out that he has repeatedly abused George Pinto, Gabe Menezes, Jose Colaco and me by calling us staunch defenders of AIDS-infected drug users, revealing his prejudice against AIDS victims. But I have come to expect nothing better from him. If I tell you what he has called me in his unsolicited private spam emails, you will throw up on your keyboard. I wonder if his children know that he spends his waking hours abusing sundry folk who disagree with him on various mailing lists. Virtually no one on Goanet has escaped his vicious abuse. If you go through the Goanet archives you will find that nearly 80 - 90% of all his posts on Goanet are abusive in nature. He even managed to offend Herman by calling him "Dada". > >Anyone who looks at the Goanet archives can see that >he posts the most personally abusive, patronising >and condescending posts on Goanet when someone >questions his conclusions, while constantly >complaining about the abuse of others. > It is amazing that this man has the gall to now call me the abuser when he has spent the last five months doing nothing but attacking almost every one who has crossed his path. The only reason he has not been kicked out of this forum is because he has not yet used one of the cruder expletives, although he has come close to doing that. I would be delighted if he manages do it now in response to this post of mine. > >Now we have people like Cecil Pinto agreeing with him >without having any idea what they are talking about. > Poor Cecil does not know what he is getting into. It is now his turn to be mercilessly savaged by Mario Goveia. > >I would like Cecil, as a defender of Santosh, or >anyone else, to refer me to the post where I called >Santosh an AIDS-infected drug user as he claims. > Again, I stand in boundless amazement at the sheer audacity of the above assertion. Is Mario Goveia's memory failing him or is he trying to see if he can deceive us? Here are three recent posts in which Mario Goveia has called those of us who exposed his AIDS-related hoax, "staunch defenders of AIDS-infected drug users", "staunch defenders of AIDS-infected sex predators", and "AIDS-infected drug users on Goanet". MARIO GOVEIA'S POST 1 http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/2005-March/026102.html --- jose colaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Is amcho Mariobab going to abuse me now just like he >abused Santoshbab ani George Pinto? > Mario replies: Hey, Jose. The AIDS-infected drug users on Goanet must be gratified to see your staunch attack on the proposition that they may leave infected needles in public places, backed up by a scientific research opinion that this presents no risk. MARIO GOVEIA'S POST 2 http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/2005-March/026153.html Mario replies to Jose Colaco: d) You, and your other staunch defenders of AIDS-infected drug users would have understood from posts by Gabriel and Viviana that the hoax email was irrelevent to the suggestion that people watch their behinds when sitting in public places. MARIO GOVEIA'S POST 3 http://www.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet/2005-March/026003.html Mario replies to Avelino D'Souza: Who knew that AIDS-infected drug users had such staunch defenders? AIDS-infected sex predators may have the same defenders. Make sure you check with Santosh, Goanet's "truth detector", that adequate research has been done to verify your story. > >And what are these guys upset about? That I will >not allow them to downplay the hazard of AIDS-infected >drug needles left in public places, intentionally or >unintentionally, that unsuspecting people may sit >on. > And finally, as expected, Mario Goveia continues to be defensive about his apparent gullibility in disseminating a fairly obvious chain letter hoax about HIV-infected needles in cinema theaters. Cheers, Santosh
