--- Nasci Caldeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Comparatively, and for historical and cultural >reasons, all Indian languages are under developed; as >compared to Chinese, Japanese, English and a host >of European languages. >
How can Nasci make such a categorical assertion? Has he done any kind of comparative linguistic analysis? Has he read the literature of any Indian language? >From my own modest understanding, being able to converse and write in Konkani and English with the same amount of facility, I can say with confidence that there are domains of human experience in which Konkani is much richer than English. Cheers, Santosh
