Dear Cecil, In response to your comments shown below, it is amazing to me that you seem bent on continuing this line of personal invective, in a discussion in which you added nothing, and after the main protagonists have stopped.
You should at least let readers know that I have challenged you, on Goanet and privately, to send me some specific examples of where I have STARTED a line of personal abuse, as opposed to retaliating to the abuse of others, or where I have defended or perpetuated a hoax. I also asked you to comment on the precise examples that Santosh cited to show that I had abused him, and I showed that he had been mistaken, obviously in the heat of his frustration at me for asserting that the risk from needle pricks was indeed LOW, but not NO. Not only have you done none of the above, you are continuing the calumny and insinuation that I alone have been personally abusive. Cheers, Mario. --- Cecil Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes that 'infected needles' debate had been going on much too long, but I think it also was beneficial in the sense that people will think twice before simply forwarding panic-creating hoaxes in future. The long drawn debate also brought a few worms out of the woodwork to comment. Hopefully they will continue to interact and contribute and not just complain. As for leaving "Mr. Goveia alone", I don't know what to say. If anyone continues to be personally abusive I think he/she has to be told off by other subscribers. We can't always expect the Admin Team to step in and play Big Momma. > > Cheers! > > Cecil