For those of us who couldn't be around, maybe following Dr
Naik's brief bullet points might be a difficult task.
Rene has responded to the arguments put forward by Dr Naik,
but obviously the priest is arguing that all the statements
enlisted by him are myths. It would have been really nice
if he could also share with us what he (Dr Naik) sees to be
the factual position in each case.As someone who has been intrigued by the politics of language in Goa since the mid-eighties (when I worked in an unabashedly pro-Konkani Herald, but didn't quite buy the arguments being put out... the paper grew in circulation, of course) this is a controversial but interesting issue.
Dr Naik had sent out the above header to his note, which was in a doc format. Any further inputs to offer the 'other' side of the story would be interesting. Thanks! FN
---------- Forwarded message ----------
I am sending the gist of my talk today at Xavier Centre of Historical Research, Alto Porvorim, Goa at 5.30 p.m.: Konkani myths and facts as attachment files. The content of my these files might help your viewers.
Thanking you,
Pratap Naik, S.J.
