From: Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Cafeteria Catholics Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
"The above post makes a lot of categorical assertions without providing any scientific or sociological justification to support them. It is very obvious that this is a strongly held religious view, despite claims to the contrary."
Nasci's response: It is not only a 'religious view'; the majority in the world supports the view; except scientific and satanic fundamentalists like you!
Santosh: " Some of the assertions are not even
internally consistent within the same religious doctrine. For instance, nobody would deny that enforced celibacy is not consistent with human nature, and yet its practice is regarded with such high esteem by the adherents of this doctrine."
Nasci's reply:
Ceibacy is enforced only on those who have willingly and knowingly become priests, after going thru years and years of theological and other tuition.(Personally I am in favour of the Church allowing those priests who wish to marry, to marry; and for married men also to be able to be priests.That way the natural urges of priests will be fulfilled, perhaps without temptation towards homosexuality and or paedoplilia!) Besides, celibacy is not a 'doctrine' per se; it is a practice; and inspite of all, if a priest cannot remain celibate, then he has the option to leave the priesthood, like a few priests have done. You see, there is no enforcement like your satanic eyes see it.
Santosh: If "marriage
Nasci:reveals the truth" of the true human nature, then why are people who choose to remain unmarried for life considered to be sick?
Who says that unmarried men are sick? This is your perverted thought! Do not equalise unmarried men with homosexuals! Your education is seriously faulted!
Santosh: "In any case, I would like to emphatically state that
Nasci:there is absolutely no scientific, clinical or sociological basis for any of the assertions made in the above post. Indeed, these assertions go against the public service recommendations of all major scientific and medical organizations, as well as against the practices of most international humanitarian agencies, including some religious ones."
Scientific and medical organisations are they really competent to pronounce judgement on sociological cum psyschiatric issues? Society has to rule on that.
Have they investigated the fact that some or all homosexuals may also be schizophrenic? and or may be really psycho form a very young age. They could be sick from the womb. But they are sick.
Cheers, Nasci Caldeira. Melbourne.
