Differences of opinion between Nasci and Santosh (part III)

There is nothing like consensual (adult) sex between a doctor and a patient; a 
priest and his parishioner; a college professor and adult student; or between 
an employer and employee.  Because this in not only a relation between two 
(?consenting) adults, but it reflects the bonds of trust between two blocks of 
parties -

the doctor with ALL his patients or 

the priest with their ENTIRE community or 

the professor and the WHOLE Student Body and their parents or 

the employer and ALL his/her employees.  

So this issue of NO sexual interactions does not only apply to priests but to a 
lot of others - however high up the ladder one may be. (See what happened to 
President Clinton). So even with consensual sex, one can kiss their career (and 
may be their marriage) good-bye, if this comes to light.  No laughing matter!!!

Santosh's theoretical / scientific perspective on homosexuality is very 
correct. But Santosh, there is no Science in Religion or else it would not be 
called Religion. By the same token, there is no Religion in Science or else it 
would not be called Science. But we need both disciplines to keep the other 
honest.  What we DON'T NEED are false accusation and flame throwing terminology 
(not necessarily by you only). The church has NEVER been homophobic or taught 
hatred as some are recently alleging. I guess they have to write something! 
:=))  We have to use the right terminology not to offend somebody's 
sensitivity. 

Fr. Ivo's and Nasci's perspectives are also correct. The church raises the bar 
on sexuality higher for Catholics and even higher for its priests and nuns.  So 
in spite of our newer understanding on sexuality, the Church still chooses to 
retain its high moral standards. So those who find it difficult to live by 
those standards, should sacrifice or leave. 
 
But this should come as no surprise. For hetero-sexuals, the church does not 
permit pre-marital sex, live-in relations, adultery, polygamy etc.  All these 
are perhaps 'acceptable behavior' to some or 'antiquated beliefs' to others and 
the norm in someone's part of the world.  So the church is not being 
homophobic, as some learned doctors or professors are saying. Yes, it is being 
conservative. And there is nothing wrong with that.

This is the difference of opinion and conflict between Nasci and Santosh.  So 
we just have to accept and respect each other's beliefs and practice patterns.  
There is no Science or Theology applied here. IMHO there is cultural, 
historical and edict practices and maintainance of one's enduring identity.

IMHO, nothing wrong wiht homosexuality or heterosexuality. But if the Church 
says, sex is ONLY within the context of mariage (obviously heterosexual) then 
the open or behind doors sexual relation (homo or hetero) with a non-married 
partner becomes De Nada - at least theoretically.  IMHO theoretically to permit 
homosexual behavior outside marriage (obviously) should also permit acceptable 
hetero-sexual behavior outside marriage.  Is that what society wants? Is that 
what Santosh is recommending - free-for-all-sex (homo or hetero) with multiple 
partners?  (What does Science / Psychiatric Association say?) So sometimes we 
need to look beyond our nose!  India's Law sanctions only monogamy. This is not 
science nor religion.  This is encoded (into law) cultural practices.

What we should NOT ACCEPT are individuals who want to have their cake and eat 
it too and call themselves pure and smart.  Yes, it is nice to have blinkers on 
and be focused on where we have come from and where one is going.  Or else we 
will be going round in circles all confused and think we are advancing.  That 
is what Fr. Ivo means by preventing Pan Americanism.  As the saying goes when 
you go around in circles, one has a limited view and not a very enlightening 
one at that. :=))

So Santosh and 'non-Catholics' should admire the Catholic Church for standing 
for 
some higher moral principles instead of succumbing to the lowest sexual 
instincts- homosexual or heterosexual. Just as Catholics should admire Hindus 
for their strict weekly fasting practices which may or many not have any 
scientific or health basis. Or the Muslims for their month-long Ramadan fast.

Thanks for reading the three posts.  
Regards. Gilbert.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* G * O * A * N * E * T *** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your mother in Goa happy on Mothers' Day.    
http://www.goa-world.com/goa/expressions/mothersday/

Limited "Mother's Happiness" packages. First come, first serve.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to