--- "Fr. Ivo Da C. Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Can time atart without Superior Intelligence? >Certainly not. >
What is the rationale for the above statement? How did you arrive at this conclusion. Is it a self-evident truth? Objective scientific evidence indicates that the emergence of any kind of intelligence (superior or inferior) in nature requires the emergence of a brain or a nervous system. There is absolutely no objective evidence or rational basis for a disembodied intelligence. > >Let science not encroach in the field of Metaphysics >and Theology. Science wil not, and cannot, answer >this question. > Why? Why is Metaphysics and Theology superior to Science in answering this question? And, theology of which religion knows the right answer? What if Buddhist and Christian theologies give conflicting answers? > >Ockham's razor cannot be applied, according to >William Ockham himself, to the truths revealed by >Christian Revelation. > In the interest of truthful disclosure of conflicts of interest, it should be revealed that William of Occam was a Christian priest - a Franciscan monk. It is not surprising that he made an exception in regards to Christian revelation. Would he feel the same about Zoroastrian revelations? Cheers, Santosh
