--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I noticed you wisely dodged all the social and > cultural questions with a politically correct answer > "I don't want to digress".:=)) >
I did not dodge your questions. As I said, I didn't want to digress. I just like to focus on one thing at a time. Please ask me the questions you want me to answer in a separate thread, and I will answer them. > >perhaps we can learn for them with pointed questions >instead of bashing them.:=)) > Please explain. > > A good case in point is the way you dismissed > religious thinkers and social philosophers with, > "But I think most religions are prejudiced against > homosexuals and homosexuality." (I think they are > against the behavior not the individuals). > I stand by my assertion regarding most religions. But I didn't say anything about social philosophers. Why are they against the behavior? > >And that does not mean others cannot ask pointed >questions and determine if the posters have a personal >agenda. > Please ask your pointed questions. I would be happy to answer them. > > Sometimes I get the feeling that your agnostic > belief (which is perfectly acceptable to me) goes > into anti-Religion, which may be going over-board. > My agnosticism is not a belief. It is a lack of belief. It is an admission that I don't know. It is also an admission that I don't have any reason to believe in certain things. Regarding religion, I think it has a role to play in our society. I only think that that role does not include providing explanations for natural phenomena. > >To the geneticists when does a variant end and an >abnormality/pathology begin? > I have already answered this question as it pertains to homosexuality in response to Fr. Ivo's post. Please refer to my response. Cheers, Santosh
