--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In the field of cancer, it is my understanding that >the INCIDENCE of an inherited cancer which determines >if it is 'sporadic', 'familial' or 'genetic' >transmitted. And not the explanation of phenotype etc >as presented by my friend Santosh. >
This does not make any sense. What explanation of phenotype presented by me? > >But this is not to knock down his scientific >credentials as a neuro-scientist but just to say that >different specialties in medicine approach the subject >differently. > The science of genetics is uniformly applicable to all biological traits. Its fundamental principles are well-established and universal. Where does Gilbert get this idea that different specialties approach it differently? > >Sex - whether Homosexual and Heterosexual has become >Recreational and a one-night-stand, rather that what >it was considered to be. That is why Santosh can ask >the question what negative personal or social effects >does 'homosexual behavior' have? > I have no idea what Gilbert is talking about here. Whatever it is, it seems to have no connection with what I have said on this subject. Cheers, Santosh
