Seb, Why don't you try and rebutt what I said in my posting on the subject, with some facts and opinions of your own? Why haven't you explained why the US left all that mid-east oil in 1991 and went home?
What you have cut and pasted below says that strong countries have more options than weak ones. How does it make your point that the US liberated Iraq for oil? Where does it even refer to oil? You are right that Iraq is worse off - for the minority Sunnis and Saddam Hussain, whom you seem to have so much sympathy for. They were murdering the majority Shia and Kurds previously to subjugate them, and are now killing them to deny them the freedom and democracy they desire. --- Seb dc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mario, I guess you need more bedrest. A never > thought! check your post > below, thats what you said. Even a one liner would > have done. I don't need > to read your long bashan. You can give that to > people who follow your > ideology. > > Anyway thanx all the same. > > PS: Btw you do good cut and paste work. > > ** > Earlier: "Mario Goveia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote. > > > > Basically, countries do what serves their > perceived > > interests. The strong ones have far more options > than > > the weak ones, who are left to accept the status > quo > > because there is nothing much they can do about > > anything. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mario Goveia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:30 PM > Subject: Re: [Goanet]Seb thinks the US invaded Iraq > for oil! > > > > --- Seb dc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does this mean; US invaded Iraq for Oil??? Sorry > to > >> say, but thats how it sounds to me ! > >> > > Mario replies: > > Seb, I'm sorry, too, but it sounds the same to > many > > people who know nothing about world affairs, and > about > > who needs oil and who doesn't. These people also > seem > > to know nothing about what Iraq was like under > Saddam, > > Iraq is no better now either!!!
