Santosh Helekar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:

If you just want me to restrict myself to your recent
posts, and not invoke posts entitled "Helekar's
Hallucinations" and "Santosh and S. (Satanic) Verses",
etc.


Santosh,

Instead to resorting to subterfuge, deception, and spurious accusations why don’t you also tell readers in what context the above stated posts were referred to as “hallucinations” and “Santosh and S verses etc” (and whatever it stands for) so that readers know the real truths.

Also the following links will show how you have been provoking netters:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goanet/message/21778
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goanet/message/21780
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goanet/message/17811
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goanet/message/21762

Secondly, are you absolutely sure that I plagiarized the three posts in 2001 --from the sources you mentioned? Or was it like the Snopes.com link regarding "Acres of Diamonds” that was provided by Santosh, which was subsequently refuted by another web-link posted by a Goanet member?

You guys are so desperate that you have resorted to sending me spams (in the form of hate mails?). This clearly shows your ulterior motives -- and solidly supports/confirms my assertion, -- now that some from Santosh’s support-group have begun to connive and tarnish/smear any and all who disagree with them and/or expose their clandestine moves. I don’t know if, Santosh and his group seriously think that I can be persuaded through intimidation and spams?

Mudslinging - insinuating that I am using a
clandestine lobbying technique perfected in politics;
strategizing with supporters to browbeat opponents;
publishing cc lists; lobbying for support.


The above is not mudslinging - insinuation; it is a fact that you have been sending ccs of your post as “advance notice” to selective support-group members, with whom you have been discussing Goanet posts privately. So you say this is not “fact” but fiction or insinuation?

Santosh, I don’t think you can defend your indefensible posts above. Again, this is an irrefutably assertion, which is confirmed beyond any doubt, -- now that you/your support-group are sending me unsolicited (spam) emails. I challenge you to refute the above by calling it a fiction, fabrication or insinuation. Please refrain from playing games and tricks on netters.

Sanctimony - claiming that your posts were simply
about being against biases and prejudices; you were
only trying to help me by pointing out that I had used
a cc list inappropriately; you were only giving me
good advice.


Verily true, you have been ccing people, and now you/your group have also sent spam posts as vendetta against people who disagree with you.

Hypocrisy - charging that my using a cc list (which is
not displayed in the public archives) amounts to
"publicly publishing" it…


On hindsight, isn’t it good that I displayed that cc list of Santosh’s advance post, so now it clearly confirms of your ulterior motives of scheming and spamming people who disagree with you.

Q. Was the post really a scam?

Santosh wrote:
No.

Then why you said that people are scammed by the "Acres of Diamond", in your following post? Or do you want to change that spurious “scam” statement below?

Santosh Helekar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
Subject: Re: [Goanet]"Acres of Diamonds".

Please see the following link to find out how we are being scammed by it:

Cheers!

Joe Vaz

_________________________________________________________________
Having a hard time finding a job? http://creative.mediaturf.net/creatives/timesjobs/hotmail_TOL.htm Log on to TimesJobs.com Click Now!


Reply via email to