On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 "jose colaco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point here is that Basilio Monteiro (an
infinitely decent human being
and a man of the cloth) has pointed out that you
are Bearing False Witness.
No one has questioned the decency or authenticity of Basilio Monteiro. In
all good faith, Basilio Monteiro rendered the written story by Santosh
Helekar, without knowledge of the inaccuracies which Santosh later admitted
to on the forum.
In hindsight, had Basilio Monteiro been advised of Santoshs subsequent
admission of the inaccuracies in the story, then he [Basilio] would have not
posted his last post on Goanet.
Basilio says that:->
1. the statement by Joe Vaz is inaccurate.
Basilio Monteiro in all probability will NOT and cannot refute Santoshs own
admission that there were inaccuracies in his [Santoshs] paper. He may only
accept Santoshs aforementioned (after-the-event) admission. Therefore, the
point of making inaccurate statements or Bearing False Witness does NOT
arise, irrespective of what others have commented on the story.
Now, if you JC want to change the version regarding Santoshs asserted
admission, you need to contact Santosh himself, to change his story. He may
oblige you and change his posted admission and, perhaps, rewrite history to
make you happy.
Will you do the Christian thing and withdraw it?
No, I cannot withdraw what Santosh has himself affirmed, admitted and
confirmed -- a message that is signed, sealed and delivered. Now, will you
do the Christian thing and withdraw your accusations and ... apparent
LIES?
Re: Your Questions #2 & #3 ... refer my answers above.
4. Why is Santosh being attacked ? Is it because
of his Hindu-sounding name?
No, I have more Hindu & Muslim friends than I have Christian friends, and I
respect their respective customs and religious beliefs. Hence, your
inferences here are totally wrong! I have NEVER attacked Santosh because of
his Hindu-sounding name but because of his unprovoked and unabated attacks
on peoples religious beliefs and his [Santoshs] statements such as the
following:
[A lot of people, including I, would strongly object to any censorship or
ban of Satanic Verses or any other religious parody in this public forum.]
Note that my debates have always been to defend a position that I felt
strongly about, and the records will reveal that I have mostly defended
netters that are even unknown to me.
You cannot excuse Joe Vaz for attacking those who
attack him. My question is
WHO is Joe vaz fronting for?
The above begs the question: WHO is JC fronting for?
Should JC be excused for his unwarranted attacks?
8. only a select audience of 25 (no students) was present.
The Dictionary meaning of Student: a student is one who directs zeal at a
subject.
Therefore, an audience with zeal to learn may be referred to as students.
JC, you are simply trying to make hay while the sun shines, and riding on
hot air and 'false pretences'. Some people never learn. Now, has Santosh
asked you to deal a new deck of cards? Look whos scratching whose back.
Didnt I mention the support-group in my post?
All the best to you, in your innuendo and false accusations!
Joe Vaz
_________________________________________________________________
Get faster and relevant results. http://search.msn.co.in Switch to the
smarter search!
