Santosh,
I have no brand of 'Secularism'. I do not consider myself that
'Intelligent'?? I dwelt on secularism, only in response to George Pinto
mentioning Secularism in refence to my first post.
Santosh! My God, you have again done it; twisting and turning, mixing up my
words, into some thing else.
1) I did not say about 'come private' on 'any brand of secularism'. What I
said is that: I do not wish to bring out religious shotcomings etc, from my
point of view, publicly; because I feel that these matters are better
discussed privately for various reasons; unless of course one is forced to
'defend'.
However I will write about my perception of seculsrism, after you, lest U
might 'copy' my words and twist them around; You have so far failed to
publish your views on 'Secularism' even though I asked you for the same;
What a shame! You are not willing to commit; only taking the easy way out by
commenting on other people's postings.
The only original posting that I have read from you is "President Pandurang'
and the likes.
Even so. I am again asking you to write on 'Secularism'; lets have an
'essay' writing competition on Secularism. U want to compete or not. George
is of course also invited to participate!
2) You definitely said that there are no hindu snake temples; that they are
Bhudhist, in a half hearted defence of hindu beliefs. This is it! Let me
tell you there is the tourism famous 'Snakes Temple' in Penang Malaysia, and
is a South Indian Hindu Temple. I have been there, and my Hindu colleague,
at the time, went there for a RITUAL, not for fun! I even took a photo of
him inside this glass enclosed snake temple. You should have at least
feigned ignorance, but lo! you blamed this unholiness, on the Bhudhists.
U know very well, that the Bhudhists only believe in realising God from
within, and do not believe in an external God like other religions do.
Santosh! U also know very well, that I have used the English phrase: the
Bhudhists will crucify you! (to which u r giving a literal slant, and saying
that Bhudhists do not crucify) for your slander against their beliefs.
Intelligent?? How pathetic!
I am sincerely awaiting your stance on : Secularism. Will we have it, or
not?
Regards,
Nasci Caldeira
Melbourne
Down Under.
Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was hoping you would have the courage to express
your views about your unique brand of secularism in
public rather than in private. I am sorry that you
don't.
P.S. By the way, there are Buddhist snake temples, and
Buddhists don't crucify others. Nor do genuinely
secular Christians, Hindus, Muslims, etc. And there is
nothing wrong with snake temples.
_____________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list.
Goanet mailing list ([email protected])
