I've often wondered whether I should dedicatedly further my own point of view in a debate because I feel it is the right view or whether I should be capable of holding two opposing points of view in my mind and appreciating both of them.
I don't know the answer to that quandary. When I get the answer maybe I will be "enlightened" like Nasci. Then again, according to Nasci I am already "enlightened" because I can eat dukra mass and a masala dosa with equal ease, notwithstanding my occasional "outbursts", which can be controlled when need be by invoking the Holy Spirit. Elisabeth ------------------------------ --- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A question that arises quite frequently in internet > discussions nowadays is: Can one engage in a > rational > discourse without expressing varying degrees of > contempt for those who hold opposing points of view? > > Cheers, > > Santosh > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _____________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. Goanet mailing list ([email protected])
