Hi Cornel,

We know you are a bright and an articulate Goan. So, if you want to share your 
thoughts with us, please feel free to do  so. You do not have to create a straw 
man, to aim your arguments against.  You have misrepresented my comments and 
placed my train of thoughts completely out of context.   Below each paragraph 
of yours are my responses.
Kind Regards, GL

------------ cornel  wrote:
CD:  I am afraid you are incorrect in your understanding of "ground realities" 
especially when you use the word "caste"  entirely a misnomer in America, as 
somehow equivalent to the concept of caste in India. Instead of your word 
"caste" in America, the terms ethnic minorities, community groups, hyphenated 
Americans, newcomers or even new social classes would definitely be more 
appropriate in your hopeful search for an appropriate term to make your point 
re America. 

GL Response: After I used the word "caste" in America, I had in parentheses 
what I meant (each immigrant group). So I had done exactly what you suggested. 
Perhaps "great minds think alike".:=))

-----------------------
CD: On another point, you seem to suggest, incorrectly that, lower caste groups 
in India are happy to stay within  their low status position by wearing caste 
on their sleeves, in clearly, your unmistakable apology for caste. The very 
substantial literature on caste in India does not support your commonsense view 
at all. There are several ways lower caste groups have historically opted for 
mobility within the caste structure or endeavored to get out of  their caste 
groups. Minimally, if you read outstanding research by Scrinivas you will note 
that  he has talked about intentional processes like westernization, 
sanskritization and change of religion as means to get out of the binds of 
traditional Hindu caste. 

GL Response: The above paragraph is irrelevant, because I did NOT suggest what 
you claim I "seem to suggest".  See below for my contrarian point to what you 
say I said.

------------------------
CD: Others have been more radical politically and are treating caste and 
casteism as racist on the global scene. They are making good progress even 
though India,  refused, for now,  to admit casteism as racism at the last 
international conference on racism (in 2004, from memory) held in Durban, South 
Africa. 

GL Response: Feel free to let your thoughts stand on its own feet without a 
bogey man - a technique used by a few on Goanet.  If you think that caste in 
India is not being "used radical politically" you are mistaken. In fact that 
was the thrust of the original post.  Hence without your reference to my 
writings, you appear to endorse what I have written.  You may hate to admit it.

--------------------
CD: No Gilbert, the smart guys you so deride are much smarter than you think!  
You have also persisted in repeating your erroneous view in this post, about a 
relative static and unchanging caste situation in India.  So let me be of some 
help re essential reading for you, from a small selection (non alphabetically 
presented) of my books on caste from my home bookshelf. After all, Goanet is a 
learning instrument: 

GL Response: I did not suggest that caste was static. In fact I made the 
opposite point. It was how the caste-groups in India (including lower caste) 
and elsewhere are using their identity and numbers to gain political clout , 
empower their social rights and gain an increased share of the economic pie.  
And I encouraged Goans to use that model. So thanks for your endorsement of my 
views and your references.  Surprise, Surprise, we are both progressives.:=))
 
---------------------------
CD: Finally, Gilbert, to make sense of how minorities adjust in their new 
destinations of migration you will find the next two books particularly 
illuminating. The first relates to the UK. The second, has excellent historical 
material about what you call mainstreaming in the USA. 

GL Response: Thanks for the references. 

--------------------
CD: Very best regards and hopefully, pleasant reading. 

GL Response: The same to you, when you read my posts.  You do not have to 
distort other peoples' writings to make your point.  In fact you should / could 
build on other peoples' views to expand the perspective. Again thanks for 
agreeing with my "simplistic views".  Imagine that!!! :=))
Regards, GL.
_______________________________________________
Goanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org

Reply via email to