> --- Peter D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I found the comments below at: > >http://www.answers.org/apologetics/hitquote.html > > > >They should put to rest some of the notions put > >forth by the Freedom From Religion Foundation and > some >agnostic Goanetters that Hitler was a devout > Roman >Catholic. > > --- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess selective hearsay quotes from a > fundamentalist religious website are all it takes > to put anybody's notions to rest. No need to read > any book on history, not even the book from which > the selective hearsay quotes are taken. > Mario observes: > Talk about cynical distortions. > I guess selectively dismissing an independent informational website as a "fundamentalist religious website" - falsely - and a highly regarded book on the subject as "hearsay" and insinuating that a history book is "not hearsay" is all part of the game for an aggressive atheist desperately trying to denigrate the information therein. Then, insinuating that the propaganda published by an organization hostile to religion called the "FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION" is credible. > Regarding the book that Peter D'Souza's post quoted from, here is an excerpt: > "The book Hitler's Secret Conversations 1941-1944 published by Farrar, Straus and Young, Inc.first edition, 1953, contains definitive proof of Hitler's real views. The book was published in Britain under the title, _Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944, which title was used for the Oxford University Press paperback edition in the United States." > The book is far more credible than any information that could possibly be published by an organization with it's agenda right in it's name, the "FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION". > Besides, all this desperate obfuscation ignores the facts of what Hitler actually DID, regardless of what he said or did not say, and especially regardless of what aggressive atheists on Goanet and organizations with specific agendas say. > Hitler repudiated by his actions over several years EVERY SINGLE TENET of the rock solid Christian moral code. To insist that someone who has done so is a Christian in good standing is plainly ludicrous. > Then, in a corresponding intellectual contortion, all the atheists on Goanet blythely repudiate the religions they were born into. Apparently applying different standards to themselves is something they hope no one will notice. >
_______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
