Santosh objects because of my reference to scientists, pseudo-scientists and mice. My apologies to him and "his patients". But here are a three short points for the readers:
1. Santosh's own research and current work (from his bio) as posted by Mario on this bulletin board was on mice. So I am a loss at his disagreement at, "mouse experiment, and its apparent extrapolation to the human situation". 2. Santosh objects to negative reference to scientists, as he states because he is one of them. Yet, he has no qualms being demagogic to oncologist with his statement, "The post appended below propagates dangerous myths and misinformation regarding cancer treatment in this public forum." Most followed the message of my post with its illustration on this lay-person bulletin board. Some who refused to read and take the time to understand, then insist that they needed to be / should be "spoon fed".=:)) 3. Santosh feels slighted at negative references to scientists and pseudo-scientists. I hope he shows the same consideration and sensitivity to other professions that he berates: individuals and persons (as in my case), and generally (as in the case of religious institutions, leaders and followers). Scientists measure and apply the same yardstick to every situation. This yardstick does not change when its applied to oneself. Kind Regards, GL --------------- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From a scientific standpoint, as a professional scientist, I disagree with the >description of the so-called mouse experiment, its apparent extrapolation to >the human situation, the specific invocation and characterization of the >immune system, and some of the generalizations made. Also as a professional scientist and at a personal level, I strongly disagree with the references to a pseudo-scientist in that post, and in a previous post in that thread. _______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
