In Gilbert's defence, one needs to clarify which one of his many grandmothers you folks are talking about.
In Gilbert's case it works like this: If the historical observations in any way negatively implicate the church (as was the case with the destruction of the Hindu temples during the Inquistion), they are classified as "old kaneos" that are not to be believed. Anything else that satisfies his half baked ideas or should I say, his dogma is immediately accepted as part of his rock solid scientific, oops, moral code. I think it would be more appropriate to rename this thread to "propagation of falshoods by christian bigots". --- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The post appended below propagates a falsehood about > me. It is falsely claimed that the following quote > is > my verbiage, and not Gilbert's: > > "Thus the grandmother's observation was accurate." > _______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
