--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some additional points are as follows: > Mario observes: > For the reasons outlined by Santosh among others such lists are bogus by definition because they are subjective, exclusive, capricious and arbitrary. Is Cybergoan #102 any less deserving than Cybergoan #101? > Recently, the intellectually exhausted and/or lazy editors of TIME magazine tacitly acknowledged this when they declared EVERYONE to be PERSON OF THE YEAR. What an absolute farce! >
