Dear all,

The following case interests me from a legal-medical-ethical point of view.
Please accept that I remain an ongoing student of all three disciplines. 
This post is posted on the basis of that studentship.

1: I do not know all the facts of this case .......accordingly
2: I do not support the contention that 'all proceedings should be dropped' 
...for
3: once these charges are made, however difficult they are to defend against
4: if they are not appropriately defended against, the stain and pain caused by 
the accusation 
will remain ....and

5: if they are accurate but dropped, injustice would have been perpetrated.
 
So .....I suggest that vociferous but honest evidence and defence be presented 
and cross examined ... even if it means that "All the Facts"  (uncomfortable as 
they may turn out to be) become publicly known.

Importantly, If the charges are made in public, so should the defence against 
the charges.

I do NOT support the dropping of any investigation or charges, in such 
situations,  unless it is 100% voluntarily done by the alleged victim. 

If the case is deemed to be frivolous or is otherwise lost, appropriate costs 
should be assigned. This will not only be fair, it will also discourage more 
such cases. In the UK, justices are known to frown upon the so-called 
Litigation Culture of the US.

The conspiracy element alleged in this case is separate and apart from the 
'harassment' charge.

jc

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Mohun-Bagan-used-female-intern-to-frame-A-K-Ganguly-PIL/articleshow/28355711.cms

"The petitioner said Jaising had been "working relentlessly to get justice 
Ganguly arrested unlawfully and to get him removed from WBHRC by building 
pressure on the government through media hoax, scandal and propaganda at the 
cost of the reputation and his rights over privacy."

Petitioner Singh derided the way Indian systems operate. She said "there has 
been a steep rise in the abuse of criminal law in the hands of the individuals 
with vested criminal interests abetted by unscrupulous lawyers, with the 
growing materialistic Indian culture of making big money quickly through 
corrupt means unlike western culture which is turning towards spiritualism."

After vouching for the 'upright' western systems experienced during her 7-year 
stay in UK, Singh feared for the safety of justice Ganguly, who is facing 
sexual harassment allegations from a law intern, given the amendment to the 
sexual harassment laws and the vindictive nature of police.

Seeking dropping of every proceeding initiated or to be initiated by the 
government and protecting him from possible arrest, Singh said: "The courts at 
lower levels callously take cognizance of every case on routine basis without 
even bothering to go through the ingredients of the FIRs/complaints. Unlike the 
courts in the western countries, the court proceedings in India are not under 
monitor of camera and are not being video-recorded."

Reply via email to