roland.francis wrote: >The problem in India is not with personal expenses, it is with receipts >(assets accumulated illegally). > >So that Ontario solution has no relevance to India. > >Also the premier who is bringing in that legislation is trying to hoodwink the >public. She is creating a ruckus about expenses of mere tens, hundreds or a >few thousand dollars while her party's previous premier has cancelled a power >generation contract which cancellation has cost taxpayers more than six or >seven billion, just to mollify local constituents who were to vote in a >by-election and who didn't want the power plant in their back yard. Didn't >they know that before signing the contract? ---------------------------------------
Roland, "6 to 7 billion" is the exact reason for the receipt idea. This way the tax payer can view a receipt and judge for him/herself if a six million dollar receipt represents a six thousand, six million or six billion expense. As always, follow the money. Mervyn
